A Fitness & exercise forum. FitnessBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FitnessBanter.com forum » Fitness & Exercise » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

(how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 22nd 07, 04:20 PM posted to misc.fitness.misc
claire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)

I am currently on a diet and eating healthily but am not noticing
results -is exercising 4/5times a week for half hour each day enough?

  #2  
Old June 22nd 07, 07:44 PM posted to misc.fitness.misc
joeu2004
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)

On Jun 22, 8:20 am, claire wrote:
I am currently on a diet and eating healthily but am not noticing
results -is exercising 4/5times a week for half hour each day enough?


Probably not, if you walk only 1 MPH during that time ;-).

The point is: it depends on two variables, namely: how many calories
you burn; and how many calories you consume.

(It also depends on how quickly you are expecting to see results. And
to some degree, it also depend on what you eat.)

If you have already taken steps to reduce your caloric intake and,
more importantly, to eat "heathily" (but of course, that is
subjective), I would suggest that you incease the intensity and
perhaps the amount of time that you exercise. But that is only a wild-
ass guess.

If you are not working with a personal trainer, you might want to post
some details about your diet and your exercise regimen to get some
concrete feedback.

Caveat: Although many people get great results by extreme caloric
reduction, I would not advise it unless you are willing to make it a
life-long life-style change. IMHO, it is much easier to maintain an
exercise regimen than to make radical changes in diet. Of course,
morbidly obese people must do both. And of course, both can be a
challenge for many people.

  #3  
Old June 27th 07, 12:57 AM posted to misc.fitness.misc
MuscleMan2885
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)

Yeah, diets only really work out if you plan to STAY on those diets
for the rest of your life.

While you're on a diet, you might get some results, but if you go back
to eating unhealthily after a few weeks or months of the diet, then
you'll gain your weight back eventually. It's usually quite hard for
someone to change their whole diet and stick to it.

On the other hand, if you make a resolution to say, not drink soft
drinks for the rest of your life, and you stick to it, then over time
that change in your diet will eventually mean a lot less sugar
consumed=less calories=less weight.

Doing some light exercise 4/5 times a week sounds great, but can you
stick to it? If you overwork yourself, then one day you might decide
that you want to stop exercising for a while and take a rest. The key
is to make the exercise REGULAR. If you only exercise two times a
week, but you can keep doing that indefinitely, then that would be
infinitely better than exercising 4/5 times a week for a month and
stopping.

So if you can exercise 4/5 times a week and keep it up (and provided
you're not straining, overexerting, and injuring yourself), then that
would help for sure. Otherwise, you'd be better off sticking to
something you can do permanently.

Also, it helps if you split up your exercise into two sessions instead
of one. I'm a little lazy to explain this again, so just read the post
I put up on my blog he
http://fitandfirm.blogspot.com/

  #4  
Old June 27th 07, 02:44 AM posted to misc.fitness.misc
Spammers_Should_Be_Shot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)


"MuscleMan2885" wrote in message
ups.com...
Yeah, diets only really work out if you plan to STAY on those diets
for the rest of your life.

While you're on a diet, you might get some results, but if you go back
to eating unhealthily after a few weeks or months of the diet, then
you'll gain your weight back eventually. It's usually quite hard for
someone to change their whole diet and stick to it.

On the other hand, if you make a resolution to say, not drink soft
drinks for the rest of your life, and you stick to it, then over time
that change in your diet will eventually mean a lot less sugar
consumed=less calories=less weight.

Doing some light exercise 4/5 times a week sounds great, but can you
stick to it? If you overwork yourself, then one day you might decide
that you want to stop exercising for a while and take a rest. The key
is to make the exercise REGULAR. If you only exercise two times a
week, but you can keep doing that indefinitely, then that would be
infinitely better than exercising 4/5 times a week for a month and
stopping.

So if you can exercise 4/5 times a week and keep it up (and provided
you're not straining, overexerting, and injuring yourself), then that
would help for sure. Otherwise, you'd be better off sticking to
something you can do permanently.

Also, it helps if you split up your exercise into two sessions instead
of one. I'm a little lazy to explain this again, so just read the post
I put up on my blog he
http://SpammersBlog.blogspot.com/


So if I split up my routine into 8 sessions I'll burn way calories? How
about splitting it into 12 sessions? That's got to be even better
right?!?!?




  #5  
Old July 2nd 07, 10:38 AM posted to misc.fitness.misc
MuscleMan2885
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)

On Jun 27, 8:44 am, "Spammers_Should_Be_Shot"
wrote:
"MuscleMan2885" wrote in message

ups.com...





Yeah, diets only really work out if you plan to STAY on those diets
for the rest of your life.


While you're on a diet, you might get some results, but if you go back
to eating unhealthily after a few weeks or months of the diet, then
you'll gain your weight back eventually. It's usually quite hard for
someone to change their whole diet and stick to it.


On the other hand, if you make a resolution to say, not drink soft
drinks for the rest of your life, and you stick to it, then over time
that change in your diet will eventually mean a lot less sugar
consumed=less calories=less weight.


Doing some light exercise 4/5 times a week sounds great, but can you
stick to it? If you overwork yourself, then one day you might decide
that you want to stop exercising for a while and take a rest. The key
is to make the exercise REGULAR. If you only exercise two times a
week, but you can keep doing that indefinitely, then that would be
infinitely better than exercising 4/5 times a week for a month and
stopping.


So if you can exercise 4/5 times a week and keep it up (and provided
you're not straining, overexerting, and injuring yourself), then that
would help for sure. Otherwise, you'd be better off sticking to
something you can do permanently.


Also, it helps if you split up your exercise into two sessions instead
of one. I'm a little lazy to explain this again, so just read the post
I put up on my blog he
http://SpammersBlog.blogspot.com/


So if I split up my routine into 8 sessions I'll burn way calories? How
about splitting it into 12 sessions? That's got to be even better
right?!?!?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Errr no. Okay let me explain.

When you exercise, you stimulate your body's metabolism. For a few
hours after you exercise your body has an increased metabolism. If you
only work out once a day, you'll only get that increased metabolism
rate for a few hours. So what I recommend is that you split your
workouts into one morning session and one evening session, so that
you'll be able to use that increased metabolism effect two times a
day.

I never said that you should do 8-12 workouts a day. I think I'd
collapse by the fourth workout 0_o.

  #6  
Old July 2nd 07, 10:47 AM posted to misc.fitness.misc
Spammers_Should_Be_Shot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)


"MuscleMan2885" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Jun 27, 8:44 am, "Spammers_Should_Be_Shot"
wrote:
"MuscleMan2885" wrote in message

ups.com...





Yeah, diets only really work out if you plan to STAY on those diets
for the rest of your life.


While you're on a diet, you might get some results, but if you go back
to eating unhealthily after a few weeks or months of the diet, then
you'll gain your weight back eventually. It's usually quite hard for
someone to change their whole diet and stick to it.


On the other hand, if you make a resolution to say, not drink soft
drinks for the rest of your life, and you stick to it, then over time
that change in your diet will eventually mean a lot less sugar
consumed=less calories=less weight.


Doing some light exercise 4/5 times a week sounds great, but can you
stick to it? If you overwork yourself, then one day you might decide
that you want to stop exercising for a while and take a rest. The key
is to make the exercise REGULAR. If you only exercise two times a
week, but you can keep doing that indefinitely, then that would be
infinitely better than exercising 4/5 times a week for a month and
stopping.


So if you can exercise 4/5 times a week and keep it up (and provided
you're not straining, overexerting, and injuring yourself), then that
would help for sure. Otherwise, you'd be better off sticking to
something you can do permanently.


Also, it helps if you split up your exercise into two sessions instead
of one. I'm a little lazy to explain this again, so just read the post
I put up on my blog he
http://SpammersBlog.blogspot.com/


So if I split up my routine into 8 sessions I'll burn way calories? How
about splitting it into 12 sessions? That's got to be even better
right?!?!?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Errr no. Okay let me explain.

When you exercise, you stimulate your body's metabolism. For a few
hours after you exercise your body has an increased metabolism. If you
only work out once a day, you'll only get that increased metabolism
rate for a few hours. So what I recommend is that you split your
workouts into one morning session and one evening session, so that
you'll be able to use that increased metabolism effect two times a
day.

I never said that you should do 8-12 workouts a day. I think I'd
collapse by the fourth workout 0_o.


OK, but let's say you worked out every 3 hours (8am, 11am, 2pm, 5pm, 8pm,
11pm) then that's got to be better right? That way you're elevating your
metabolism from 8am until past midnight! And that's with only working out
every 3 hours, since your metabolism isn't a light switch (On/Off) it must
slow down in the third hour? Therefore, working out every 2 hours must be
even better (8am, 10am, noon, 2pm, 4pm, 6pm, 8pm, 10pm) - that's just a
matter of splitting up your routine into 8 parts, which really wouldn't be
too hard.


  #7  
Old July 2nd 07, 09:34 PM posted to misc.fitness.misc
Spammers_Should_Be_Shot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)


"joeu2004" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Jul 2, 2:47 am, "Spammers_Should_Be_Shot"
wrote:
"MuscleMan2885" wrote in message
When you exercise, you stimulate your body's metabolism. For a few
hours after you exercise your body has an increased metabolism.
[....] So what I recommend is that you split your workouts into one
morning session and one evening session, so that you'll be able to
use that increased metabolism effect two times a day.

[....]
OK, but let's say you worked out every 3 hours (8am, 11am, 2pm, 5pm,
8pm, 11pm) then that's got to be better right?


Not necessarily. You continue to commit the fallacy of exaggeration.
Just because something is good __in_moderation__, that does not mean
it is good in the extreme. Conversely, just because something is not
good in the extreme, that does not mean it is not good in moderation.

I am neither subscribing to nor debunking "MuscleMan's" assertion.
But your comments are unreasonable, IMHO, which seems very
uncharacteristic of you. I wonder if someone has hijacked your login
and is trying to discredit you by posting absurd comments ;-).


Damn, I only got involved in this thread because MuscleMan spammed his blog.
Just thought I'd have a little fun with him (and to see if he could explain
any exercise related topic other than just copy-pasting some article onto
his blog).



  #8  
Old July 2nd 07, 10:43 PM posted to misc.fitness.misc
joeu2004
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)

On Jul 2, 2:47 am, "Spammers_Should_Be_Shot"
wrote:
"MuscleMan2885" wrote in message
When you exercise, you stimulate your body's metabolism. For a few
hours after you exercise your body has an increased metabolism.
[....] So what I recommend is that you split your workouts into one
morning session and one evening session, so that you'll be able to
use that increased metabolism effect two times a day.

[....]
OK, but let's say you worked out every 3 hours (8am, 11am, 2pm, 5pm,
8pm, 11pm) then that's got to be better right?


Not necessarily. You continue to commit the fallacy of exaggeration.
Just because something is good __in_moderation__, that does not mean
it is good in the extreme. Conversely, just because something is not
good in the extreme, that does not mean it is not good in moderation.

I am neither subscribing to nor debunking "MuscleMan's" assertion.
But your comments are unreasonable, IMHO, which seems very
uncharacteristic of you. I wonder if someone has hijacked your login
and is trying to discredit you by posting absurd comments ;-).

  #9  
Old July 3rd 07, 02:39 AM posted to misc.fitness.misc
Cyli
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 03:47:37 -0600, "Spammers_Should_Be_Shot"
wrote:



OK, but let's say you worked out every 3 hours (8am, 11am, 2pm, 5pm, 8pm,
11pm) then that's got to be better right? That way you're elevating your
metabolism from 8am until past midnight! And that's with only working out
every 3 hours, since your metabolism isn't a light switch (On/Off) it must
slow down in the third hour? Therefore, working out every 2 hours must be
even better (8am, 10am, noon, 2pm, 4pm, 6pm, 8pm, 10pm) - that's just a
matter of splitting up your routine into 8 parts, which really wouldn't be
too hard.


Uh, huh. Interesting reasoning, if you were a pro athlete or fitness
instructor being paid to run classes at those hours.

Most people have real lives that prohibit that sort of exercise
schedule.

If you're sincere in this idea, I suggest you see a mental health
professional before bothering with physical exercise.
--

r.bc: vixen
Minnow goddess, Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher.
Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
  #10  
Old July 3rd 07, 07:51 AM posted to misc.fitness.misc
Spammers_Should_Be_Shot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default (how much exercise is advisable to do a week to lose weight)


"joeu2004" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 2, 1:34 pm, "Spammers_Should_Be_Shot"
wrote:
Damn, I only got involved in this thread because MuscleMan spammed his

blog.
Just thought I'd have a little fun with him (and to see if he could

explain
any exercise related topic other than just copy-pasting some article

onto
his blog).


I disagree with your use of the term "spam" in this case. IMHO,
"spam" is a posting that has no other purpose than to advertise (or
troll). In this case, "MuscleMan" responded to an inquiry with an
opinion that addressed the OP. It does not surprise me that many
responders are trainers and wannabees who have web sites of their
own. It is not unreasonable for them to refer people to their web
site, IMHO.

If you wanted to challenge MM's understanding or debunk his theory,
you could have done so with reasonable rebuttal. Your thoughtless
taunts and exaggerations merely make __you__ sound like someone who
does not know what you're talking about, IMHO.


OK, you're not familiar with MM's postings. A quick review: on June 26-28
he started the same "spam" thread (with link to his blog) 6 times to 6
different newsgroups. Since then, he's posted to this thread (originally
with his blog link - thankfully that's since be removed) and one other post
to a different thread (also of course with his blog linked). So yeah, at
this point his ratio of spam to non-spam is pretty damn poor. Depending
upon how you want to classify his later posts it's either 6:2 or 8:0
(spam:non-spam).

If you wanted to look further, you could also consider that in the last week
since setting up his blog, he's posted 10 times on Yahoo Answers (using the
name DaMan2885), all 10 of his posts want people to go to his blog.

That concludes his postings, so would you consider his pattern to be that of
a spammer or not?


As far as how I responded to his posts, I was attempting to "troll" but as
I've never done it before my trolling skills are lacking. Maybe I shoulda
just pulled a Bob and screamed obscenities and told him to FOAD?





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8 Things You MUST Do To Build Maximum [email protected] Weights 7 April 1st 07 10:13 PM
Principles of Weight Loss Gary Matthews General 1 February 26th 05 11:12 PM
Swimming ---Is Weight Loss Possible? RECNEPS Swimming 192 February 18th 05 11:37 PM
10 Lies About The Atkins Diet diets.marketassociate.com Weights 0 January 7th 05 08:41 PM
Weight machine ?s Me Weights 16 May 16th 04 12:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 FitnessBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.