A Fitness & exercise forum. FitnessBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FitnessBanter.com forum » Fitness & Exercise » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Situps and pushups



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 5th 04, 02:19 AM
meirman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Situps and pushups

On tv over the last year, whenever anyone does push-ups or sit-ups,
they do wimpy ones. They don't lower their chest or their back,
respectively, to the floor. This makes them much easier to do.

Is tv promoting wimpism, or has there been a determination that the
old, difficult methods can cause harm?

Should I continue to do my exercises the way I was taught in JHS?

I'm getting back in shape. I've lost 51 pounds (and maybe 8 inches
off my waist) and it's time I started exercising (beyond walking and
some physical work).

Crossposted. Could you please say what group you are replying from,
so I can read what else you have to say?


(I have maybe 29 pounds to go to my original maximum goal weight.
I'll reevaluate when I get there. The absolute most I have to lose is
45 more pounds, but I don't think I want to do that.)




Meirman

If emailing, please let me know whether
or not you are posting the same letter.
Change domain to erols.com, if necessary.
  #2  
Old December 5th 04, 03:01 AM
Manco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

meirman wrote:
On tv over the last year, whenever anyone does push-ups or sit-ups,
they do wimpy ones. They don't lower their chest or their back,
respectively, to the floor. This makes them much easier to do.


Don't pay attention to the TV, unless it's a certified fitness instructor on
TV or you have a fitness DVD on.

Is tv promoting wimpism, or has there been a determination that the
old, difficult methods can cause harm?


Who cares? Just do the correct exercises.
Should I continue to do my exercises the way I was taught in JHS?

Of course. Pushups have to be all the way to the ground and up, straight
back, and slow reps to get the proper contraction. Situps are more
complicated as they're really ab exercises and there are a variety of leg
positions you could take with this. Refer to Pilates.

I'm getting back in shape. I've lost 51 pounds (and maybe 8 inches
off my waist) and it's time I started exercising (beyond walking and
some physical work).


Great work.


  #3  
Old December 6th 04, 02:42 AM
Steve Freides
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"meirman" wrote in message
...
On tv over the last year, whenever anyone does push-ups or sit-ups,
they do wimpy ones. They don't lower their chest or their back,
respectively, to the floor. This makes them much easier to do.

Is tv promoting wimpism, or has there been a determination that the
old, difficult methods can cause harm?

Should I continue to do my exercises the way I was taught in JHS?

I'm getting back in shape. I've lost 51 pounds (and maybe 8 inches
off my waist) and it's time I started exercising (beyond walking and
some physical work).

Crossposted. Could you please say what group you are replying from,
so I can read what else you have to say?


(I have maybe 29 pounds to go to my original maximum goal weight.
I'll reevaluate when I get there. The absolute most I have to lose is
45 more pounds, but I don't think I want to do that.)


Keep up the good work! The best exercise program is the one you perform
consistently and without injury, so whatever works for you is great. As
time goes on, you'll probably want to try exercises that are harder for
each repetition and of which you do fewer repetitions, but there is no
need to hurry in that direction if you're content and making progress.
Enjoy your success, report back when you plateau and need to try
something different.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com


  #4  
Old December 6th 04, 03:15 AM
Blair P. Houghton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Manco wrote:
Should I continue to do my exercises the way I was taught in JHS?

Of course. Pushups have to be all the way to the ground and up, straight
back, and slow reps to get the proper contraction.


Have to?

The U.S. Army teaches pushups go as low as horizontal
upper arms. Not all the way to the ground.

Of course, there's nothing wrong with extending your range
of motion when exercising.

But "have to" is kind of subjective.

--Blair
"What you get out is something like
what you put in. Plus bigger muscles."
  #5  
Old December 6th 04, 04:19 AM
Roy Schestowitz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

meirman wrote:

On tv over the last year, whenever anyone does push-ups or sit-ups,
they do wimpy ones. They don't lower their chest or their back,
respectively, to the floor. This makes them much easier to do.


Yes. There are certain types of motion that are harmful to the back. In the
long run, this can cause serious aches. If you find it easy, do it more
slowly. A common mistake is doing it as quickly as possible rather than 3-5
seconds per repetition. You can also add weight resistance.

Remember: your body _feels_, it does not _count_.

Is tv promoting wimpism, or has there been a determination that the
old, difficult methods can cause harm?


I'm pretty sure that's the case.

I'm getting back in shape. I've lost 51 pounds (and maybe 8 inches
off my waist) and it's time I started exercising (beyond walking and
some physical work).


Well done!

--
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com
  #6  
Old December 6th 04, 04:31 AM
Manco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Blair P. Houghton wrote:
Manco wrote:
Should I continue to do my exercises the way I was taught in JHS?

Of course. Pushups have to be all the way to the ground and up,
straight back, and slow reps to get the proper contraction.


Have to?

The U.S. Army teaches pushups go as low as horizontal
upper arms. Not all the way to the ground.

Of course, there's nothing wrong with extending your range
of motion when exercising.

But "have to" is kind of subjective.


well, the lower you go the harder each pushup is, the better results you
get. I speak about it, because I do it.


  #7  
Old December 6th 04, 11:56 PM
Renegade5
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well... that's the thing with body-weight exercises - you need to be
able to modify them to allow for different levels.

I suspect that's that audience that those push-ups are aimed at - the
group that is advanced enough to do them on their toes (rather than
their knees) but not to the level of doing the full dip.

BTW, after the full dip there are a number of more advanced push-ups.
In addition to changing the hand positions, there the Atlas Push-up
(done between two chairs) to get an ever greater range of motion,
there's the push-up with feet elevated, and then of course there's the
Hindu Push-up.



On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 21:19:08 -0500, meirman
wrote:

On tv over the last year, whenever anyone does push-ups or sit-ups,
they do wimpy ones. They don't lower their chest or their back,
respectively, to the floor. This makes them much easier to do.

Is tv promoting wimpism, or has there been a determination that the
old, difficult methods can cause harm?

Should I continue to do my exercises the way I was taught in JHS?

I'm getting back in shape. I've lost 51 pounds (and maybe 8 inches
off my waist) and it's time I started exercising (beyond walking and
some physical work).

Crossposted. Could you please say what group you are replying from,
so I can read what else you have to say?


(I have maybe 29 pounds to go to my original maximum goal weight.
I'll reevaluate when I get there. The absolute most I have to lose is
45 more pounds, but I don't think I want to do that.)




Meirman

If emailing, please let me know whether
or not you are posting the same letter.
Change domain to erols.com, if necessary.


  #8  
Old December 7th 04, 02:12 AM
Blair P. Houghton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Manco wrote:
Blair P. Houghton wrote:
Manco wrote:
Should I continue to do my exercises the way I was taught in JHS?

Of course. Pushups have to be all the way to the ground and up,
straight back, and slow reps to get the proper contraction.


Have to?

The U.S. Army teaches pushups go as low as horizontal
upper arms. Not all the way to the ground.

Of course, there's nothing wrong with extending your range
of motion when exercising.

But "have to" is kind of subjective.


well, the lower you go the harder each pushup is, the better results you
get. I speak about it, because I do it.


"Harder" is subjective, too. As are "better results."

--Blair
"Depends on what you want."
  #9  
Old December 9th 04, 02:14 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I suggest that you try the Charles Atlas Course

http://www.charlesatlas.com/
Good Luck

Rigoberto Muniz
http://home.earthlink.net/~muniz1/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Protein intake, only pushups and situps Vinh Trinh Weights 7 August 3rd 04 01:01 AM
Playing with pushups Steve Freides Weights 5 June 8th 04 06:24 PM
Need info about Armed Forces Bootcamp req's Brian Link Weights 50 March 17th 04 11:14 PM
How does a scrawny weakling like myself improve his benching? Rodney Weights 108 January 25th 04 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 FitnessBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.